FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT:         Ald. Brian Benford          332-3098 (cell)

                        Ald. Austin King              213-0104 (cell)

                        Ald. Brenda Konkel         345-8720 (cell)

 

Progressive Alders Offer Alternative to DCR Proposal

Substitute motion would fund needed services, keep current structure

 

Madison – Three Alders today are announcing an alternative proposal to strengthen the city’s enforcement of civil rights laws.  The proposal, below, will be offered as a substitute by Alderpersons Brian Benford, Austin King, and Brenda Konkel at the Council meeting of June 21.

 

“I applaud the Mayor for initiating a discussion on civil rights in our community – it is long overdue, and it has led to a healthy resurgence in dialogue about race, disability, gender, and other protected classes.  We have heard loud and clear, however, that the public does not support the restructuring of the Affirmative Action Department (AAD) and Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) into a new Department of Civil Rights,” said Ald. Benford, District 12. “The diverse community organizations and individuals who have spoken out against this proposal deserve real progress and funding commitments for important services, not merely bureaucratic changes that fail to truly help us achieve our civil rights goals.”

 

Organizations that have formally opposed the Mayor’s plan include the City’s Affirmative Action Commission, the Madison Equal Opportunities Commission, Communities United, Latinos United for Change and Advancement (LUCHA), the ACLU, NAACP, League of Women Voters, Progressive Dane, the Madison Times, Umoja and the Equal Opportunities Commission staff.

 

Ald. Austin King, District 8, acknowledged that the alternative is more expensive than the original proposal, but held that the community would support the increased funding of these services.  “It’s true that our proposal is not cost-neutral, but one thing that citizens on both sides of this issue have agreed on is that civil rights are highly valued in this city.  I think it’s appropriate for the Council to recognize the community’s support for civil rights by investing in these services.  There’s no better indication of our values than what we prioritize in our budget, and I think this city prioritizes civil rights.”

 

“Instead of implementing a restructuring plan that has been met with significant resistance and concern from impacted groups, we believe the Council should start by taking immediate, tangible steps – as outlined in our alternative proposal - that will achieve many of the goals identified by the community as important.  Let’s begin to demonstrate our commitment to continuing to address these issues, and fund critically needed services, and let’s do it without the potential to weaken the quality and quantity of services offered by these two vital City agencies,” said Ald. Brenda Konkel, District 2.  “Regardless of the outcome of the restructuring proposal, we need to continue to work on a variety of other issues in our community such as inequities in bus fare increases, affordable housing, affordable childcare, improved job training programs and much, much more.”      

 

 

 

Alternative Proposal