FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Ald. Brian Benford 332-3098
(cell)
Ald. Austin King 213-0104 (cell)
Ald. Brenda Konkel 345-8720 (cell)
Progressive Alders Offer Alternative to DCR Proposal
Substitute motion would fund needed services, keep
current structure
Madison – Three Alders today are
announcing an alternative proposal to strengthen the city’s enforcement of
civil rights laws. The proposal, below,
will be offered as a substitute by Alderpersons Brian Benford, Austin King, and
Brenda Konkel at the Council meeting of June 21.
“I applaud the Mayor for
initiating a discussion on civil rights in our community – it is long overdue,
and it has led to a healthy resurgence in dialogue about race, disability,
gender, and other protected classes. We
have heard loud and clear, however, that the public does not support the
restructuring of the Affirmative Action Department (AAD) and Equal
Opportunities Commission (EOC) into a new Department of Civil Rights,” said
Ald. Benford, District 12. “The diverse community organizations and individuals
who have spoken out against this proposal deserve real progress and funding
commitments for important services, not merely bureaucratic changes that fail
to truly help us achieve our civil rights goals.”
Organizations that have formally
opposed the Mayor’s plan include the City’s Affirmative Action Commission, the
Madison Equal Opportunities Commission, Communities United, Latinos United for
Change and Advancement (LUCHA), the ACLU, NAACP, League of Women Voters,
Progressive Dane, the Madison Times, Umoja and the Equal Opportunities
Commission staff.
Ald. Austin King, District 8,
acknowledged that the alternative is more expensive than the original proposal,
but held that the community would support the increased funding of these
services. “It’s true that our proposal
is not cost-neutral, but one thing that citizens on both sides of this issue
have agreed on is that civil rights are highly valued in this city. I think it’s appropriate for the Council to
recognize the community’s support for civil rights by investing in these
services. There’s no better indication
of our values than what we prioritize in our budget, and I think this city
prioritizes civil rights.”
“Instead of implementing a
restructuring plan that has been met with significant resistance and concern
from impacted groups, we believe the Council should start by taking immediate,
tangible steps – as outlined in our alternative proposal - that will achieve
many of the goals identified by the community as important. Let’s begin to demonstrate our commitment to
continuing to address these issues, and fund critically needed services, and
let’s do it without the potential to weaken the quality and quantity of
services offered by these two vital City agencies,” said Ald. Brenda Konkel,
District 2. “Regardless of the outcome
of the restructuring proposal, we need to continue to work on a variety of
other issues in our community such as inequities in bus fare increases,
affordable housing, affordable childcare, improved job training programs and
much, much more.”
Alternative
Proposal